Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice

Authors

  • N. V. Tumanskaya Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine,
  • A. V. Klymenko Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine,
  • T. M. Kichangina Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine,
  • N. A. Yareshko Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine,
  • I. P. Dzhos Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, Ukraine,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2017.2.109675

Keywords:

magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, biliary tract, diagnostics

Abstract

The review of the literature analyzes the current role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing the pathology of intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. The methodology of the study, the main types of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, the features of their conduct are described. The main indications for the use of the method are given, the possibilities of MRI-cholangiography and the factors influencing the research and interpretation of the obtained data are estimated.

References

Griffin, N., Charles-Edwards, G., & Grant, L. A. (2012). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP. Insights Imaging, 3(1), 11–21. doi: 10.1007/s13244-011-0129-9.

Kaltenthaler, E. C., Walters, S. J., Chilcott, J., Blakeborough, A., Bravo Vergel, Y., & Thomas, S. (2006). MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Medical Imaging, 6, 9–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-6-9.

Sheridan, M. B. (2002) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should no longer be used as a diagnostic test: the case in favour. Digestive & Liver Disease, 34, 370–374. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80132-3.

Melamud, K., LeBedis, C. A., Anderson, S. W., & Soto, J. A. (2014). Biliary Imaging: Multimodality Approach to Imaging of Biliary Injuries and Their Complications. RadioGraphics, 34, 613–623. doi: 10.1148/rg.343130011.

Vasil'ev, A. Yu., & Ratnikov, V. A. (2006) Magnitno-rezonansnaya kholan giografiya v diagnostike zabolevanij zhelchevyvodyashchikh putej [Magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of diseases of the bile ducts]. Moscow: Medicina. [in Russian].

Rummeny, E. J., Reimer, P., & Heindel, W. (2014) Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya tela [MR Imaging of the Body]. Moscow: MEDpress-inform. [in Russian].

Sodickson, A., Mortele, K. J., Barish, M. A., Zou, K. H., Thibodeau, S., & Tempany, C. M. (2006). Three-dimensional Fast-Recovery Fast Spin-Echo MRCP: Comparison with Two-dimensional Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Techniques. Radiology, 238(2), 549–59. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2382032065.

Mandarano, G., & Sim, J. (2008) The diagnostic MRCP examination: overcoming technical challenges to ensure clinical success. Biomed Imaging Interv J., 4(4), e28. doi: 10.2349/biij.4.4.e28.

Liu, K., Xie, P., Peng, W., & Zhou, Zh. (2015) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions. Oncology Letters, 9(4), 1917–1921. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2935.

Tirkes, T., Sandrasegaran, K., Sanyal, R., Sherman, S., Schmidt, C. M., Cote, G. A., & Akisik, F. (2013) Secretin-enhanced MR Cholangiopancreatography: Spectrum of Findings. RadioGraphics, 33, 1889–1906. doi: 10.1148/rg.337125014.

Manfredi, R., Frulloni, L., Mantovani, W., Bonatti, M., Graziani, R., & Pozzi Mucelli, R. (2011). Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic MR Imaging–MR Cholangiopancreatography Findings at Diagnosis, after Steroid Therapy, and at Recurrence. Radiology, 260, 428–436. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101729.

Borghei, P., Sokhandon, F., Shirkhoda, A., & Morgan, D. E. (2013). Anomalies, Anatomic Variants, and Sources of Diagnostic Pitfalls in Pancreatic Imaging. Radiology, 266(1), 28–36. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112469.

Forsmark, С. Е. (2008). The early diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Clinical Gastroenterology. Hepatol, 6, 1291–1293.

Dave, M., Elmunzer, B. J., Dwamena, B. A., & Higgins, P. D. (2010). Primary sclerosing cholangitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology, 256(2), 387–396. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091953.

Gulati, K., Catalano, O. A., & Sahani, D. V. (2007) Review: Advances in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: From morphology to functional imaging. Indian Jornal of Radiology and Imaging, 17(4), 247–53.

Suthar, M., Purohit, S., Bhargav, V., & Goyal, P. (2015) Role of MRCP in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Causes of Biliary Obstruction. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Reserch, 9(11), TC08–TC12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14174.6771.

Parkhisenko, Yu. A., & Gorokhov, A. V. (2010) Gidropressivnaya magnitno-rezonansnaya kholangiopankreatografiya: eyo mesto v diagnostike boleznej gepatopankreatoduodenal'noj oblasti [Hydropressive magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: its place in the diagnosis of hepatopancreatoduodenal diseases]. Vestnik e´ksperimental'noj i klinicheskoj khirurgii, 3(4), 344–347. [in Russian].

Romagnuolo, J., Bardou, M., Rahme, E., Joseph, L., Reinhold, C., & Barkun, A. N. (2003). Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(7), 547–57. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00006.

Verma, D., Kapadia, A., Eisen, G. M., & Adle,r D. G. (2006). EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endoscopy, 64(2), 248–54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.038.

Internal Clinical Guidelines Team (UK). (2014). Gallstone Disease. Diagnosis and Management of Cholelithiasis, Cholecystitis and Choledocholithiasis. NICE Clinical Guidelines, 188.

Shanmugam, V., Beattie, G. C., Yule, S. R., Reid, W., & Loudon, M. A. (2005). Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? The British Journal of Radiology, 78(934), 888–93. doi: 10.1259/bjr/51075444.

Ledro-Cano, D. (2007) Suspected choledocholithiasis: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography? A systematic review. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 19(11), 1007–1011. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328133f30b.

Chen, W., Mo, J. J., Lin, L., Li, C. Q., & Zhang, J. F. (2015) Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 21(11), 3351–3360. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3351.

Trufanov, G. Ye., Rud', S. D., Bagnenko, S. S., & Lytkina, S.I. (2011) Luchevaya diagnostika zabolevanij zhelchevyvodyashchikh putej [Radiation diagnosis of bile duct diseases]. Saint Petersburg: ELBI-SPb. [in Russian].

Van Hoe, L., Vanbeckeoort, D., Mermuys, K., & Van Steenbergen, W. (2006) MR Cholangiopancreatography. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Katabathina, V. S., Dasyam, A. K., Dasyam, N., Hosseinzadeh, K. (2014). Adult Bile Duct Strictures: Role of MR Imaging and MR Cholangiopancreatography in Characterization. RadioGraphics, 34, 565–586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.343125211.

Ratnikov, V. A., Cheremisin, V. M., & Sheiko, S. B. (2002) Sovremennyye luchevye metody (ul'trazvukovoe issledovanie, rentgenovskaya komp'yuternaya i magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya) v diagnostike kholedokho litiaza (obzor literatury) [Modern Radiological Methods (US, CT and MRI) in Diagnostics of Choledocholithiasis (Literature Review)]. Medicinskaya vizualizaciya, 3, 99–106. [in Russian].

Ratnikov, V. A. (2002). Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya pri zhelchnokamennoj bolezni i eyo oslozhneniyakh: metodika provedeniya i diagnosticheskiye vozmozhnosti [Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Bile Stones Disease and her Complications: Technique of Realization and Diagnostic Possibilities]. Medicinskaya vizualizaciya, 2, 52–59. [in Russian].

Guarise, A., Baltieri, S., Mainardi, P., & Faccioli, N. (2005) Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis. La radiologia medica, 109(3), 239–251.

den Dulk, A. C., Wasser, M. N., Willemssen, F. E., Monraats, M. A., de Vries, M., van den Boom, R., et al. (2015) Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Assessment of Nonanastomotic Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation. Transplantion Direct., 1(10), e42. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000556.

Xu, Y. B., Min, Z. G., Jiang, H. X., Qin, S. Y., & Hu, B. L. (2013). Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Transplantation Proceedings, 45(6), 2341–2346. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.031.

Rustagi, T., & Njei, B. (2014). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreas divisum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas, 43(6), 823–8.

Shen, Zh., Munker, S., Zhou, B., Li, L., Yu, Ch., & Li, Y. (2016) The Accuracies of Diagnosing Pancreas Divisum by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Scienntific Reports, 6, 35389. doi: 10.1038/srep35389.

Budigi, B., Kala, P., & Avantsa, R. (2016). Pitfalls of MRCP: What every radiologist must know! Congress: ECR 2016, C-1123. doi: 10.1594/ecr2016/C-1123.

Hyodo, T., Kumano, S., Kushihata, F., Okada, M., Hirata, M., Tsuda, T., et al. (2012) CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree. An international journal of radiology, radiation oncology and all relation science, 85(1015), 887–896. doi: 10.1259/bjr/21209407.

Manfredi, R., & Pozzi Mucelli, R. (2016). Secretin-enhanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas. Radiology, 279(1), 29–43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015140622.

Downloads

How to Cite

1.
Tumanskaya NV, Klymenko AV, Kichangina TM, Yareshko NA, Dzhos IP. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice. Pathologia [Internet]. 2017Sep.27 [cited 2024Nov.26];(2). Available from: http://pat.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/109675

Issue

No. 2 (2017)

Section

Review

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Лицензия Creative Commons
    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).