Predictors of prolongation of the hospital stay in patients with cholecystolithiasis after laparoscopic surgical interventions on the gallbladder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2018.1.129440Keywords:
cholecystolithiasis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy, predictors of the prolongation of the period of postoperative hospital stayAbstract
The purpose of the study is to identify predictors associated with prolongation of the period of hospital stay more than 48 hours in patients with cholecystolithiasis after laparoscopic surgery on the gallbladder (laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cholecystolithotomy).
Material and methods. The one-center open prospective study involved 136 patients with cholecystolithiasis. The average age of the patients was 48.9 ± 12.6 years (from 22 to 78 years), 79.41 % – women. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 103 patients, of which 53 patients had 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) and 50 patients – single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). Laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy (LCLT) was performed in 33 patients. Groups of patients were comparable by age. The baseline indices of laboratory general-clinical and biochemical blood tests, ultrasound scan of the hepato-biliary system, the duration of surgical intervention and the duration of stay in the hospital were evaluated. Predictors were determined using binary logistic regression.
Results. The average duration of laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy was 61.06 ± 13.27 minutes, which was significantly longer than the duration of laparoscopic four-port cholecystectomy (42.83 ± 16.97 minutes, P = 0.001) and single-port cholecystectomy (36.60 ± 14.37 minutes, P = 0.001). The average duration of SILC (36.60 ± 14.37 minutes) was significantly shorter than the mean duration of 4PLC (42.83 ± 16.97 minutes), (P = 0.039). The average stay in hospital after surgery (4PLC, SILC and LCLT) did not exceed 4.2 days, and the shortest period of postoperative hospital stay was in patients with the LCLT group, although the difference did not reach the limit of statistical probability. Most of the studied parameters, including anthropometric (body weight, height, body mass index, age, gender), had no probable effect on the duration of staying in hospital after surgery. The excess of fibrinogen in the blood serum from the baseline of over 2.2 g/L in patients with cholecystolithiasis increases the risk of delay in the hospital more than 48 hours after the intervention by 20 times (95 % CI 2.97–136.61; P = 0.002). The decrease of the hemoglobin level <135 g / L in the preoperative period was associated with an increase of odds ratio of prolonging the stay of patients in the hospital for more than 72 hours by 2.48 times (95 % CI 1.16–5.29), and the absence of an increase in body temperature on the first day after the operation on the gallbladder reduced the odds ratio of stay in the hospital by 66% (VS = 0.34; 95 % DI 0.1661–0.6885; P = 0.0028).
Conclusions. The influence of the type of laparoscopic intervention (SILC, 4PLC, LCLT) on the duration of postoperative stay of patients with cholecystolithiasis has not been established. The predictor of staying in the hospital for more than 48 hours after operation in patients with cholecystolithiasis was the preoperative level of fibrinogen above 2.2 g/l. The level of hemoglobin before the surgery on the gallbladder less than 135 g/l increases the risk of prolonged postoperative stay of patients for more than 72 hours by 2.48 times, and the absence of increased body temperature on the first day after the operation reduces the risk of delay in the hospital for more than three days by 66 %.
References
Cheng, S. P., Chang, Y. C., Liu, C. L., Yang, T. L., Jeng, K. S., Lee, J. J., & Liu, T. P. (2008) Factors associated with prolonged stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Surg Endosc., 22(5), 1283–1289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9610-4.
Gurusamy, K., Junnarkar, S., Farouk, M., & Davidson, B. R. (2008) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 95, 161–168. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6105.
Howard, D. P. J., Isherwood, J., Jabri, Y., Saunders, R., & Phillips, D. (2011) Factors associated with prolonged hospital stay following planned day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: General 0032. British Journal of Surgery, 98, 139.
Issa, M. E., Al-Rashedy, M., Ballester, P., & Ammori, B. J. (2005) Predictors of duration of postoperative hospital stay in patients undergoing advanced laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech., 15(2), 90–93.
Morimoto, Y., Mizuno, H., Akamaru, Y., Yasumasa, K., Noro, H., Kono, E., & Yamasaki, Y. (2015) Predicting prolonged hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg., 8(3), 289–295. doi: 10.1111/ases.12183.
Sato, N., Yabuki, K., Shibao, K., Mori, Y., Tamura, T., Higure, A., & Yamaguchi, K. (2014) Risk factors for a prolonged operative time in a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford), 16(2), 177–182. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12100.
Tran, T. T., Kaneva, P., Mayo, N. E., Fried, G. M., Feldman, L. S. (2014) Short-stay surgery: what really happens after discharge? Surgery., 156(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.024.
Uchiyama, K., Takifuji, K., Tani, M., Onishi, H., & Yamaue, H. (2002) Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc., 16(11), 1594–1597. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9018-0.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).