Legal consequences, measures of prevention and reduction of medical malpractice cases (errors)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2019.1.166616Keywords:
medical errors, health care, legal liabilityAbstract
This work is purposed for determining grounds for legal consequences to come when any medical malpractice cases occur.
Aim. The goal of our research is to determine the quintessence features of “medical malpractice (error)” in the medical-legal context so to determine legal consequences of medical malpractices (errors), and to classify the regulatory measures of prevention of medical malpractice cases and reduction of these problems.
Methods: semiotical, synergetic, anthropological and hermeneutical, method of normative comparison.
Results. Detecting the current medical malpractice (medical error) becomes more complicated due to its definition as highly significant differences in interpreting, understanding, qualifying, finding defects, medical errors and provability of these failures result in the complication of producing efficient legal guarantees for protection of the patient`s right. The peculiarity of this medical and legal substrate is that it synthesizes the awareness of rights and medicine both through the lens of their achievements. A clear vision of such a phenomenon as medical malpractice (error) has a priori significance for the legal environment. It is a sparkling example of the epistemological and gnoseological interaction of the medical and legal knowledge as to determine criteria of medical malpractices is to set “boundaries” of the legal regulation. Here we mean the occurrence of legal consequences in committing an error of law.
Conclusions. For a more complete understanding of cases of legal consequences the following regulatory measures of prevention of medical malpractice cases are necessary: establishment of an effective system of prudential internal control of defects in the medical care; specialised training for medical personnel on methods of detection of medical malpractices, their prediction and prompt elimination of possible consequences; instrumental, functional and system-structural measures for reducing risks of medical malpractice, namely: actions for reducing medical errors caused by system determinants (failures, disorders, etc.), actions for reducing medical errors made in prescribing and applying medicaments, medical errors happened because of the medical intervention, surgical in particular; improvement of the legal support of guarantees of patients and doctors rights for a safe delivery of medical aid and prevention of medical errors.
References
Ponkina, A. A. (2012). Vrachebnaya oshibka v kontekste prav cheloveka [Medical error in the context of human rights]. Moscow. [in Russian].
(2010). Patientsäkerhetslag. Retrieved from http:https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/patientsakerhetslag-2010659_sfs-2010-659
Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [The only state register of court decisions]. Retrieved from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
(2001). Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Criminal Code of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. Kyiv: Parlam. vyd-vo. [in Ukrainian].
(2003). Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Code of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. Kyiv: Parlam. vyd-vo. [in Ukrainian].
MacCourt, D., & Bernstein, J. (2009) Medical error reduction and tort reform through private, contractually-based quality medicine societies. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 35(4), 505–61.
Stucky, E. R. (2003) Prevention of Medication Errors in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting. Committee on Drugs and Committee on Hospital Care of the American academy of pediatrics. Pediatrics, 112(2), 431–6.
Voropaeva, L. S., & Parkanov, N. Yu. (2015). Vrachebnye oshibki: e´ticheskij aspekt [Medical errors: ethical aspect]. Byulleten' medicinskikh internet-konferencij, 5, 569. [in Russian].
Jalal, Poorolajal, Shirin, Rezaie, & Negar, Aghighi (2015). Barriers to medical error reporting. Int J Prev Med., 6(1), 97. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.166680
Pigolkin, Yu. I., Morozov, Yu. E., & Globa, I. V. (2018) Kompetenciya vracha i yurista v ustanovlenii vrachebnoj oshibki [Competence of a doctor and a lawyer in establishing a medical error]. Aktual'nye problemy mediciny i biologii, 2, 58–59. [in Russian]. doi: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10018
Klimenko, O. V. (2016) Derzhavne rehuliuvannia medychnoi praktyky v Ukraini: henezys i tendentsii rozvytku (Dis… dokt. med. nauk). [State regulation of medical practice in Ukraine: genesis and development trends Dr. med. sci. diss.] Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Ludupova, E. Y. (2016) Medicinskie oshibki. Literaturnyj obzor [Medical errors. Literature review]. Bulleten' Rosszdravnadzora, 2, 6–15. [in Russian].
Kalinin, R. E., & Barinov, E. H. (2018) Rol' sudebno-medicinskoj e'kspertizy materialov ugolovnogo dela v opredelenii e'lementov i priznakov «yatrogennogo» prestupleniya [Role of forensic medical examination of materials of criminal case in defining the elements and signs of “iatrogenic” crime]. Zhurnal sudebnoj mediciny, 2, 30–35. [in Russian].
Maciá Gómez, R. El error de diagnóstico y el error de tratamiento médico en el derecho español. Retrieved from http://www.porticolegal.com/pa_articulo.php?ref=333
Khubulava, G. G. (2016). O filosofii vrachebnoj oshibki [On the philosophy of «Doctor's Error»]. Medicinskij al'manakh, 1(41), 26–29. [in Russian]. doi: 10.21145/2499-9954-2016-1-26-29
Nevzgodina, E. L. (2015) Yuridicheskaya kvalifikaciya medicinskoj oshibki yeye pravovye posledstviya [Legal qualification of medical error and legal implications]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo», 2(43), 137–144. [in Russian].
Holquist, C. Medication errors: an FDA perspective. European Union Regulatory Workshop on Medication Errors. Retrieved from http://www. ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/resentation/2013/03/WC500139886.pdf
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).