The effectiveness of the use of various options for drainage of the abdominal cavity in creating a model of chronic peritonitis and the determination of indicators of total peritoneal fibrosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2019.2.177161Keywords:
peritonitis, peritoneal fibrosisAbstract
For the early diagnosis and prognosis of chronic peritonitis, today there is an urgent need to create an optimal model of chronic peritonitis, to determine the indicators and rates of progression of peritoneal fibrosis.
The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of using different options for drainage of the abdominal cavity when creating a model of chronic peritonitis and determining the indicators of the formation of total peritoneal fibrosis in the dynamics of peritonitis.
Materials and methods. In the experiment on 60 rats aged 90 days, weighing 220–250 g, chronic peritonitis was simulated by intraperitoneal injection of living cultures of E. coli bacteria and 10 % of fecal suspension (0.5 ml per 100 g of animal weight) through the drainage, as well different options for setting abdominal drainage for peritoneal lavage with an antiseptic were used. In group 1 in 20 rats, drainage was inserted under visual control through a laboratory wound and fixed to the parietal peritoneum on the right flank; in group 2 in 20 rats, the drainage was inserted under visual control through the laboratory wound and fixed to the parietal peritoneum on the right flank; in group 3 in 20 rats, blind insertion of abdominal drainage by trocar was performed. After 12 and 24 hours, the abdominal cavity was flushed three times with 0.9 % NaCl solution and 50 % betadine solution. All rats were injected with 5 ml of mesogel to prevent the formation of adhesions and ensure the functioning of drains, and on the 2nd day 10 % fecal suspension was administered (0.5 ml per 100 g of animal weight). After 12, 24 hours, 5 and 12 days of the experiment, the peritoneal inflammatory process was monitored taking into account blood leukocytosis. To evaluate the effectiveness of various abdominal drainage options, on the 5th, 7th, 14th, 30th, and 60th days, the cytological profile of the washes from the peritoneum of rats, the lethality of animals, the number of festering wounds and the drainage migration were determined.
Results. It has been established that a model of chronic peritonitis with the support of chronic inflammation and the development of peritoneal fibrosis was created only by inserting abdominal drainage under visual control through counteraperture on the back of the surface with its fixation along the right flank to the parietal peritoneum. In these animals, stable long-term leukocytosis was achieved in the range of 10.2–13.3 × 109/l, the cytological profile of the peritoneum washes was characterized by a significant increase (P ˂ 0.05) in the number of mitoses in mesotheliocytes against the background of their relatively stable number. On the 60th day of the experiment, the histological examination determined the loss of the integumentary mesothelium, abundant overlap of connective tissue fibers was observed on the thickened basement membrane of the peritoneum; in the washes from the peritoneum, the number of mesotheliocytes inversely correlated with the degree of fibrosis following the increase in the number of fibrocytes in 1 mm3 (r = -0.98, P < 0.05).
Conclusions. In late stages of experimental chronic peritonitis with the insertion of drainage of the abdominal cavity through conteraperture on the dorsal surface and fixation of its right flank to the parietal peritoneum in rats, persistent blood leukocytosis occurs within 10.2 × 109/l, in the washes from the peritoneum there is a decrease in the number of mitoses in mesotheliocytes and an increase in the number of fibrocytes, which allows us to consider these parameters as indicators of the development of diffuse peritoneal fibrosis.
References
Savytskyi, I. V., Tshipoviaz, S. V., Belash, О. V., Vastyanov, R. S., Znamerovskyi, S. G., Lenik, R. G., et al. (2018). Issledovanie gematologicheskikh pokazatelej pri e'ksperimental'nom peritonite [Investigation of hematological indices in experimental peritonitis]. Klinicheskaya khirurgiya, 85(6), 63–66. [in Russian]. doi: 10.26779/2522-1396.2018.06.63
Tabibian, N., Swehli, E., Boyd, A., Umbreen, A., & Tabibian, J. (2017). Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity. Annals of Medicine And Surgery, 15, 9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021
Vogels, R., Bosmans, J., van Barneveld, K., Verdoold, V., van Rijn, S., Gijbels, M., et al. (2015). A new poly(1,3-trimethylene carbonate) film provides effective adhesion reduction after major abdominal surgery in a rat model. Surgery, 157(6), 1113–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.004
Wu, Z., Boersema, G., Vakalopoulos, K., Daams, F., Sparreboom, C., Kleinrensink, G., et al. (2014). Critical analysis of cyanoacrylate in intestinal and colorectal anastomosis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 102(3), 635–642. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33039
Bosmans, J., Moossdorff, M., Al-Taher, M., van Beek, L., Derikx, J., & Bouvy, N. (2016). International consensus statement regarding the use of animal models for research on anastomoses in the lower gastrointestinal tract. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 31(5), 1021–1030. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2550-5
Vakalopoulos, K., Wu, Z., Kroese, L., Jeekel, J., Kleinrensink, G., Dodou, D., et al. (2017). Sutureless closure of colonic defects with tissue adhesives: an in vivo study in the rat. The American Journal of Surgery, 213(1), 151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.009
Kraemer, B., Scharpf, M., Planck, C., Tsaousidis, C., Enderle, M., Neugebauer, A. et al. (2014). Randomized experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation of conventional monopolar contact coagulation versus noncontact argon plasma coagulation in a rat model. Fertility and Sterility, 102(4), 1197–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.007
Lipatov, V. A. (2013) Koncepciya profilaktiki posleoperacionnogo spaechnogo processa bryushnoj polosti s primeneniem bar'ernykh sredstv (Avtoref. dis… dokt. med. nauk) [The concept of prevention of postoperative adhesive process of the abdominal cavity with the use of barrier agents. Dr. med. sci. diss.]. Kursk. [in Russian].
Alonso, J., Alves, A., Watanabe, M., Rodrigues, C., & Hussni, C. (2014). Peritoneal Response to Abdominal Surgery: The Role of Equine Abdominal Adhesions and Current Prophylactic Strategies. Veterinary Medicine International, 2014, 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/279730
Saed, G. M., Fletcher, N. M., & Diamond, M. P. (2015). The Creation of a Model for Ex Vivo Development of Postoperative Adhesions. Reproductive Sciences, 23(5), 610–612. doi: 10.1177/1933719115607997
Kosovskih, A. A., Caen, S. L., Churljaev, J. A., & Bykova, E. V. (2012). Korrekciya narushenij mikrocirkulyacii pri rasprostranennom gnojnom peritonite [Correction of infringgements of microcirculation at a widespread peritonitis]. Khirurgiya, 6, 42–45. [in Russian].
Boyko, V. V., & Yevtushenko, D. A. (2013) Sposob profilaktiki spajkoobrazovaniya u ranee operirovannykh bol'nykh na organakh bryushnoj polosti [A method for preventing adhesions in patients previously operated on the abdominal organs]. Innovacii v nauke, 25, 177–181. [in Russian].
Kondratovich, L. M. (2014). [The Basics for Comprehension of Adhesive Process Formation in Abdominal Cavity. Perioperative Prevention by means of Anti-Adhesive Drugs (Review of Literature)]. Journal of New Medical Technologies, 21(3), 169–173. doi: 10.12737/5929
Poroyskiy, S. V., Poroyskaya, A. V., & Bulycheva, O. S. (2014). Morfometricheskaya kharakteristika parietal'noj i visceral'noj bryushiny v dinamike posle naneseniya operacionnoj travmy razlichnogo ob''ema [Morphometric characteristics of the parietal and visceral peritoneum in the dynamics after various sizes surgical operation trauma application]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta, 3(51), 102–107. [in Russian].
Zhura, A. V., Tratsyak, S. I., Khryshchanovich, V. J., & Makarevich, Z. A. (2017). E'ksperimental'naya model' peritoneal'nykh spaek [Experimental Model of Peritoneal Adhesion]. Novosti khirurgii, 25(4), 333–339. [in Russian]. doi: 10.18484/2305-0047.2017.4.333
Tikhonov, V. I., Plotnikov, M. V., Logvinov, S. V., Grishchenko, V. Yu., & Shkatov, D. A. (2014). Vliyanie antioksidantnogo kompleksa na processy spajkoobrazovaniya v e'ksperimente [Effect of antioxidant complex on the processes of adhesion in the experiment]. Voprosy rekonstruktivnoj i plasticheskoj khirurgii, 17, 1(48), 31–40. [in Russian].
Nasrtdinov, I. G., Ishkinin, R. E'., & Garipov, I. I. (2016). Protivospaechnye sposoby obrabotki bryushnoj polosti [Antiseptic methods of abdominal cavity treatment]. Novaya nauka: problemy i perspektivy, 4–2, 30–33. [in Russian].
Pawar, A., & Biswas, S. (2016). Postoperative Spine Infections. Asian Spine Journal, 10(1), 176–183. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.176
Mehrotra, R., Devuyst, O., Davies, S., & Johnson, D. (2016). The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis. Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, 27(11), 3238–3252. doi: 10.1681/asn.2016010112
Nadeau-Fredette, A., Johnson, D., Hawley, C., Pascoe, E., Cho, Y., Clayton, P. et al. (2016). Center-Specific Factors Associated with Peritonitis Risk--A Multi-Center Registry Analysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 36(5), 509–518. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2015.00146
Ye, H., Zhou, Q., Fan, L., Guo, Q., Mao, H., Huang, F., et al. (2017). The impact of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. BMC Nephrology, 18(1), 186. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0588-4
Viglino, G., Neri, L., & Feola, M. (2015). Peritoneal ultrafiltration in congestive heart failure—findings reported from its application in clinical practice: a systematic review. Journal of Nephrology, 28(1), 29–38. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0166-9
Garosi, G. (2003). Different Aspects of Peritoneal Sclerosis. Contributions to Nephrology, 140(140), 18–29. doi: 10.1159/000071385
Reimold, F., Braun, N., Zsengellér, Z., Stillman, I., Karumanchi, S., Toka, H., et al. (2013). Transcriptional Patterns in Peritoneal Tissue of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis, a Complication of Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis. Plos ONE, 8(2), e56389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056389
Machado, N. (2016). Sclerosing Encapsulating Peritonitis: Review. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 16(2), e142–151. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.02.003
Shahbazov, R., Talanian, M., Alejo, J., Azari, F., Agarwal, A., & Brayman, K. (2018). Surgical Management of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: A Case Report in Kidney Transplant Patient. Case Reports In Surgery, 2018, 4965459. doi: 10.1155/2018/4965459
Brown, E., Bargman, J., van Biesen, W., Chang, M., Finkelstein, F., Hurst, H. et al. (2017). Length of Time on Peritoneal Dialysis and Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis – Position Paper for ISPD: 2017 Update. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 37(4), 362–374. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00018
Johnson, D., Cho, Y., Livingston, B., Hawley, C., McDonald, S., Brown, F., et al. (2010). Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Kidney International, 77(10), 904–912. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.16
Ito, Y., Kinashi, H., Katsuno, T., Suzuki, Y., & Mizuno, M. (2017). Peritonitis-induced peritoneal injury models for research in peritoneal dialysis review of infectious and non-infectious models. Renal Replacement Therapy, 3. doi: 10.1186/s41100-017-0100-4
van Diepen, A., van Esch, S., Struijk, D. G., & Krediet, R. T. (2015). The First Peritonitis Episode Alters the Natural Course of Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 35(3), 324–332. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00277
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).