Non-invasive control of oxygen consumption during inhalation anesthesia of antireflux laparoscopic interventions by the method of Minimal flow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2020.3.221817Keywords:
sevoflurane, methods of Low flow, Minimal flow, oxygen consumptionAbstract
Aim: to study the features of the general anesthesia of antireflux laparoscopic interventions in abdominal surgery using sevoflurane by the method of Low flow, Minimal flow from the standpoint of the ERAS protocol.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted at State Institution of Science “Research and Practical Centre of Preventive and Clinical Medicine” of State Administrative Department, it was prospective and not randomized. Forty patients with esophageal hernia of the diaphragm, who underwent laparoscopic crurorraphy and Nissen fundoplication were examined. The age of patients ranged from 21 to 76 years. There were 10 men (25 %) and 30 women (75 %). Patients enrolled in the study had informed consent to be examined, tested, and processed. All patients underwent combined low-flow inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane in combination with perioperative multimodal analgesia during surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group – Low flow anesthesia (n = 20) included patients who underwent combined inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane with a flow of fresh gas mixture (FGF) 1.0 l/min, the second group – Minimal flow anesthesia (n = 20 ) included patients who underwent combined inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane with a fresh gas mixture (FGF) flow of 0.5 l/min. In the study, we analyzed monitoring indicators, which included registration of non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, 5-lead electrocardiography, registration of peripheral oxygen saturation (SrO2) + plethysmogram, depth of anesthesia according to BIS, working pressure in the operating space. Gas exchange indicators – capnography, oxygen and sevoflurane concentration in the mixture during inhalation and exhalation, ventilation parameters were constantly monitored. The monitoring is supplemented by our developed and patented method of intraoperative non-invasive control of oxygen consumption by the patient during inhalation anesthesia in the operating room.
Formation, storage, analysis of electronic database, statistical data processing and visualization of research results were performed in license packages: MedStat v. 4. and Microsoft Office.
Results. In the study of oxygen consumption by patients of the first and second groups, it was found that at stages 3 and 4 of surgery VO2 was higher compared to stages 1, 2, 5, 6. Statistically significant differences in VO2 in the study periods in the first and second groups were not detected. In both subgroups, there was no significant statistical difference between the indicators of BIS at the stages of surgery during 2–6 stages of the study, which were at the level of the surgical stage of anesthesia.
Conclusions. Monitoring of oxygen consumption by the patient is one of the criteria of intraoperative safety of the patient and adequacy of anesthesia. Oxygen consumption by the patient at all the stages of surgery makes it possible to claim that use of the method of Minimal flow anesthesia is safe for the patient.
References
Bharatam, K. K., Raj, R., Subramanian, J. B., Vasudevan, A., Bodduluri, S., Sriraman, K. B., & Abineshwar, N. J. (2015). Laparoscopic nissen rossetti fundoplication: Possibility towards day care anti-reflux surgeries. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 4(4), 384-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.10.005
Markar, S. R., Naik, R., Malietzis, G., Halliday, L., Athanasiou, T., & Moorthy, K. (2017). Component analysis of enhanced recovery pathways for esophagectomy. Diseases of the esophagus, 30(10), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dox090
Puccetti, F., Fumagalli, U., De Pascale, S., Melis, A., & Rosati, R. (2016). Comparative effectiveness and analysis of postoperative outcomes after enhanced recovery programme for oesophagectomy. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 12, e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.02.015
Giacopuzzi, S., Weindelmayer, J., Treppiedi, E., Bencivenga, M., Ceola, M., Priolo, S., Carlini, M., & de Manzoni, G. (2017). Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: a single center experience. Diseases of the esophagus, 30(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dow024
Li, W., Zheng, B., Zhang, S., Chen, H., Zheng, W., & Chen, C. (2017). Feasibility and outcomes of modified enhanced recovery after surgery for nursing management of aged patients undergoing esophagectomy. Journal of thoracic disease, 9(12), 5212-5219. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.11.110
Dogan, K., Kraaij, L., Aarts, E. O., Koehestanie, P., Hammink, E., van Laarhoven, C. J., Aufenacker, T. J., Janssen, I. M., & Berends, F. J. (2015). Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obesity surgery, 25(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1355-2
Park, J. H., Lee, J. S., Lee, J. H., Shin, S., Min, N. H., & Kim, M. S. (2016). Effect of the Prolonged Inspiratory to Expiratory Ratio on Oxygenation and Respiratory Mechanics During Surgical Procedures. Medicine, 95(13), e3269. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003269
Li, F., & Yuan, Y. (2015). Meta-analysis of the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane versus propofol during cardiac surgery. BMC anesthesiology, 15, 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0107-8
Bande, D., Sadurni, M., García, C., Carazo, J., Corcoy, M., & Montes, A. (2016). Is balanced analgesia (tramadol + paracetamol + dexketoprofen) a good option in laparoscopic colon surgery? Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 12, e38-e39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.02.029
Checketts, M. R., Alladi, R., Ferguson, K., Gemmell, L., Handy, J. M., Klein, A. A., Love, N. J., Misra, U., Morris, C., Nathanson, M. H., Rodney, G. E., Verma, R., Pandit, J. J., & Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (2016). Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia, 71(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13316
Pędziwiatr, M., Kisialeuski, M., Wierdak, M., Stanek, M., Natkaniec, M., Matłok, M., Major, P., Małczak, P., & Budzyński, A. (2015). Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol - Compliance improves outcomes: A prospective cohort study. International journal of surgery, 21, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.087
Feldheiser, A., Aziz, O., Baldini, G., Cox, B. P., Fearon, K. C., Feldman, L. S., Gan, T. J., Kennedy, R. H., Ljungqvist, O., Lobo, D. N., Miller, T., Radtke, F. F., Ruiz Garces, T., Schricker, T., Scott, M. J., Thacker, J. K., Ytrebø, L. M., & Carli, F. (2016). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 60(3), 289-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12651
Shtompel, I. V. & Chernii, V. I. (2020). Sposib intraoperatsiinoho neinvazyvnoho kontroliu spozhyvannia kysniu patsiientom pid chas inhaliatsiinoi anestezii [Method of intraoperative non-invasive control of oxygen consumption by patient during inhalation anesthesia]. Ukraine Patent UA 141845. https://base.uipv.org/searchINV/search.php?action=viewdetails&IdClaim=267987
https://base.uipv.org/searchINV/search.php?action=viewdetails&IdClaim=267999 – неправильне посилання
Pasichnyk, H. P. (2015). Osoblyvosti kisnevogo balansu ta tkanynnogo dihannya pru chirurgighnomu likuvanni adenoma gipofiza [Features of oxygen balance and tissue respiration in the surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas]. Medytsyna nevidkladnykh staniv, (7), 50-56. [In Ukrainian].
Sykes O. (2017). Metabolic oxygen requirements. Anaesthesia, 72(3), 415-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13819
Sen, O., Umutoglu, T., Aydın, N., Toptas, M., Tutuncu, A. C., & Bakan, M. (2016). Effects of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SpringerPlus, 5, 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1963-5
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).