An experimental study on the effectiveness of probiotic disinfectants in the treatment of disseminated peritonitis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2025.1.314568

Keywords:

peritonitis, treatment, experiment, endogenous intoxication, multiple organ failure, probiotics

Abstract

The aim of the work was to investigate the effectiveness of probiotic disinfectants for sanitation of the abdominal cavity in experimental peritonitis.

Material and methods. An experimental study was conducted at the Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine on 45 white sexually mature male Wistar rats aged 4–5 months, which were used to simulate peritonitis. The rats were divided into 3 groups, 15 animals in each. The treatment of animals in the main group (group I) was as follows: the abdominal cavity was washed with a 5 % solution of probiotic disinfectant, after which a probiotic disinfectant spray was applied, and after suturing the surgical wound, a gel with probiotics was applied to it. A sorbent solution was used to clean the abdominal cavity of rats in the comparison group (group II). Treatment of rats in the placebo control group (group III) consisted of washing the abdominal cavity with 0.9 % NaCl solution. In the postoperative period, all animals received antibacterial and analgesic therapy. Relaparotomies for the purpose of abdominal cavity sanitation were performed at intervals of 24–48 hours. Immunological, histological, histochemical and immunohistochemical studies were performed.

Results. In the group of animals treated with probiotic disinfectants, 10 (66.7 %) rats survived, in which peritonitis was eliminated, as evidenced by clinical, immunological and morphological results. In the animals of the comparison group, 8 (53.3 %) rats survived, in which peritonitis was eliminated. All animals of the placebo control group died from severe peritonitis. The use of the developed treatment in the experiment in animals of group I contributes to a decrease in the cytolytic activity of blood serum in relation to their own leukocytes and the preservation of the functional capabilities of monocytes at an adapted level already on the 5th day of the study. At the same time, on the 7th day, the indicators of the functional activity of monocytes corresponded to the reference values. At the same time, in experimental animals of group II, optimization of the studied indicators occurred only on the 7th day of the experiment. However, they did not correspond to the limits of the reference values. In group III, the studied indicators were significantly reduced relative to the reference values throughout the study.

Conclusions. In group I, 66.7 % of animals survived, in group II – 53.3 %, while in group III – all animals died, which indicates the ineffectiveness of abdominal cavity sanitation with 0.9 % NaCl solution in widespread peritonitis. When using probiotic disinfectants in animals of group I, there is a gradual increase in the number of CD68+ cells in the tissue infiltrate with a significant restoration of monocyte functionality according to the general NCT test. While when using the sorbent and 0.9 % NaCl solution, a critical decrease in the number of CD68+ cells with simultaneous suppression of their function is noted on the 7th day, which indicates the activation of the immune response and the positive effect of the developed treatment in animals of group I.

Author Biographies

O. O. Bilyayeva, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor of the Department of General and Emergency Surgery

I. V. Karol, Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital

PhD, Head of the Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery

O. O. Diadyk, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor of the Department of Morphology, Clinical Pathology and Forensic Medicine

References

Bilyayeva OO, Kryzhevsky VV, Karol IV. [Causes of unsatisfactory results of diagnostics of peritonitis at the prehospital stage]. Ukrainskyi medychnyi chasopys. 2021;(4):1-4. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.32471/umj.1680-3051.144.214004

Pramastya H, Song Y, Elfahmi EY, Sukrasno S, Quax WJ. Positioning Bacillus subtilis as terpenoid cell factory. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130(6):1839-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14904

Stülke J, Grüppen A, Bramkamp M, Pelzer S. Bacillus subtilis, a Swiss Army Knife in Science and Biotechnology. J Bacteriol. 2023;205(5):e0010223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00102-23

Iqbal S, Begum F, Rabaan AA, Aljeldah M, Al Shammari BR, Alawfi A, et al. Classification and Multifaceted Potential of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Bacillus subtilis Group: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules. 2023;28(3):927. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28030927

Kovács ÁT. Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27(8):724-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2019.03.008

Wang X, Hao G, Zhou M, Chen M, Ling H, Shang Y. Secondary metabolites of Bacillus subtilis L2 show antiviral activity against pseudorabies virus. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1277782. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1277782

Mascena GV, Melo MC, Gadelha DN, Oliveira TK, Brandt CT. Severe autogenously fecal peritonitis in ageing Wistar rats. Response to intravenous meropenem. Acta Cir Bras. 2014;29(9):615-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8650201400150010

Goldblum JR, Lamps LW, McKenney JK. Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Copyright; 2018.

Dabbs DJ. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry : theranostic and genomic applications. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2021.

Fijan S, Frauwallner A, Langerholc T, Krebs B, Ter Haar Née Younes JA, Heschl A, et al. Efficacy of Using Probiotics with Antagonistic Activity against Pathogens of Wound Infections: An Integrative Review of Literature. Biomed Res Int. 2019 2019:7585486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7585486

Leistner R, Kohlmorgen B, Brodzinski A, Schwab F, Lemke E, Zakonsky G, et al. Environmental cleaning to prevent hospital-acquired infections on non-intensive care units: a pragmatic, single-centre, cluster randomized controlled, crossover trial comparing soap-based, disinfection and probiotic cleaning. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;59:101958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101958

Polyovyy VP, Sydorchuk RI, Fedonyuk LY, Rotar OV, Polyovyy PV, Chepega IG, et al. Application of antibiotics and probiotics for prevention of antibiotic-associated dysbiosis in patients with generalized peritonitis and enteral dysfunction supports staff awareness. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(3 cz 1):508-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202103123

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Bilyayeva OO, Karol IV, Diadyk OO. An experimental study on the effectiveness of probiotic disinfectants in the treatment of disseminated peritonitis. Pathologia [Internet]. 2025Apr.30 [cited 2025May17];22(1):41-6. Available from: https://pat.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/314568

Issue

Section

Original research